Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix a potentially lax hash comparison
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Nov 10 2015, 5:58 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F19730206: D14455.diff
Sat, Feb 14, 1:35 PM
F19730205: D14455.diff
Sat, Feb 14, 1:35 PM
F19554737: D14455.id.diff
Fri, Jan 30, 2:15 AM
F19510378: D14455.id34952.diff
Jan 11 2026, 8:36 AM
F19510377: D14455.id34952.diff
Jan 11 2026, 8:36 AM
F19470637: D14455.diff
Jan 5 2026, 7:53 PM
F19153861: D14455.id34952.diff
Dec 11 2025, 12:27 PM
F19147036: D14455.id34949.diff
Dec 10 2025, 3:57 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Reviewers
chad
Commits
Restricted Diffusion Commit
rPb3d3130b718d: Fix a potentially lax hash comparison
Summary

Via HackerOne. See D14025. I missed this comparison when making the original change.

Test Plan
  • Used cat mail.txt | scripts/mail/mail_handler.php --process-duplicates to pipe mail in a whole lot of times.
  • Tried bad hashes, saw rejections.
  • Tried good hash, saw mail accepted.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

epriestley retitled this revision from to Fix a potentially lax hash comparison.
epriestley updated this object.
epriestley edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
epriestley added a reviewer: chad.
chad edited edge metadata.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Nov 10 2015, 6:19 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.