Is there any way to specify in a commit message who the auditor should be?
Specifically, for a small set of files we work with, we still are unable to use arc. So I have a Herald rule as recommended in the docs that adds a certain project as an auditor to commits for which no differential revision exists.
This is very coarse though and while often correct, sometimes ends up needlessly involving the `#default_audits` project members. Many times, the committer knows who should audit the actual change. But right now, they have to specify that person later through the web UI, and there's no way for them to remove the `#default_audits` reviewer.
Ideally what I'd like to do is something where they can specify the reviewer in the commit message and only add `#default_audits` if no specific reviewer is listed. Is there any way to accomplish that with Herald/built-in commit message parsing?