Page MenuHomePhabricator

Add comments to internal Phame Posts
ClosedPublic

Authored by chad on Nov 10 2015, 5:25 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Dec 13, 6:06 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Dec 12, 5:45 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Dec 12, 8:40 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Dec 8, 3:45 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Dec 8, 12:09 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Dec 2, 8:37 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Dec 2, 8:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Nov 30, 7:49 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

Adds commenting to Phame Posts, also testing a new "document comment style". Unsure about it but Phame is a prototype so good place to explore.

Test Plan

Leave some comments, see some comments, test show/hide.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Branch
phame-comments
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
Tests Passed
Build Status
Buildable 8746
Build 10167: Run Core Tests
Build 10166: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

chad retitled this revision from to Add comments to internal Phame Posts.
chad updated this object.
chad edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
chad added a reviewer: epriestley.
epriestley edited edge metadata.
epriestley added inline comments.
src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostViewController.php
81–82

Thinking about this, do we really even need to impose this restriction, given that stuff is internal-facing and we have other stuff like "subscribing to the blog subscribes to posts"? Maybe just leave it off for now until we find that the timeline is too spammy in practice and can't clean it up in other ways?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Nov 10 2015, 10:02 AM

I don't disagree on fundamentals, but it changes my work from being "design a commenting tool" to "redesign timeline". It might be I still end up at the same place, but right now I want to explore the first one a bit more.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.