User Details
User Details
- User Since
- Mar 8 2017, 1:52 PM (401 w, 4 d)
- Availability
- Available
Mar 9 2017
Mar 9 2017
RJVB added a comment to T5029: Fill in missing context for low-context diffs against tracked repositories.
Mar 8 2017
Mar 8 2017
RJVB added a comment to T12368: better support for "raw" patches, in particular corresponding to uncommitted changes?.
How do you make guarantee that unrelated, simultaneous, uncommitted changes in the same working copy do not interfere with each other?
RJVB added a comment to T12368: better support for "raw" patches, in particular corresponding to uncommitted changes?.
The problem to be solved is that workflows as I've tried to describe aren't possible. Workflows where there is no official policy that changes first have to be committed, signed off or whatever before they can be considered for inclusion upstream. Or if you want, workflows in a more relaxed community with smaller and larger contributions coming in from a wide variety of users and developers not all of whom are experts in using git, svn or what have you.
RJVB added a comment to T12368: better support for "raw" patches, in particular corresponding to uncommitted changes?.
Sorry, the Root Problem was clear enough in my head but apparently not explicit enough in the OP. I hope to have addressed that now.
RJVB renamed T12368: better support for "raw" patches, in particular corresponding to uncommitted changes? from better support for "raw" patches? to better support for "raw" patches, in particular corresponding to uncommitted changes?.