Last follow-up -- no, it was not a custom policy. The log of changes to the Project configuration show that the original setting for the edit policy was indeed "Project Members", which seems to indicate that Phabricator was incorrectly preventing new members from editing the Project.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Jan 11 2020
Jan 9 2020
Jan 8 2020
I was unable to reproduce this with a new Project, which makes me suspect the problem isn't a bug in Phabricator. I suspect the Project that was not editable *actually* had a Custom policy with specific users added to it, rather than a "Project Members" policy.
I ran into this issue today as well. The context was a Project created by a regular user a few months back. He added himself and one other user to the Project. He also set the edit policy for the Project to be "Project Members." A few months later, a couple of other users were added to the Project, but neither of them could edit the Project (all links in the "Manage" UI were disabled, can't create milestones, etc.). The users who were in the group when the edit policy was set were still able to manage the group. One of them had to change the edit policy because the newer members of the group could not.
Jan 7 2020
Jan 6 2020
Jan 5 2020
Dec 19 2019
See also PHI1594, which wants:
See also PHI1579.
Dec 17 2019
Dec 15 2019
Dec 13 2019
Dec 10 2019
Dec 9 2019
Dec 5 2019
After 2.5 years of not upgrading because I didn't want to lose phabot, we finally have (went fairly smoothly yay). Is there a slightly less terse explanation for how I can do as @joshuaspence said? Or at least a pointer to the right documentation for such a project?
We use the bot quite heavily at my company. Is there anything stopping me from just copying the deleted code into a libphutil extension and continuing to use it? Really, PhabricatorBotLogHandler is what we care about most.
Nov 30 2019
Nov 28 2019
Nov 26 2019
Can confirm this is fixed. Yay!
I believe T13462 resolved this.
there is no way to bin/host query against the set of instances using a particular repository shard service
Nov 25 2019
In D20927, I implemented a policy rule like this:
Update Almanac definitions for all instances not on the paired db023 shard.
PHI1566 is resolved narrowly. These cleanup steps still need to happen.
(Updating addresses with bin/host query leaves the service address cache dirty (the "mutable structure cache" via PhabricatorRepository->getAlmanacServiceRefs()) so it should be followed with bin/cache purge --caches general.)
I'll flesh this out more later, but the move away from db123 = repo123 shard pairing, plus bin/host query using mysql makes it difficult to directly query instances using a particular repository service.
Minor issue that should be looked at during service sync arising from improved validation elsewhere:
I'm deploying the new host now. We just crossed a release so I'm going to manually restore it to 72f82abe07 once it comes up (see also T13359). Then, I'll resynchronize instance services for active instances.
Instance termination completed after about 20 minutes and all the volumes detached. Since the original instance can be recycled, I'm going to reattach and restart it, and throw away the replacement host.
Normal volume detachment is just spinning, which isn't exactly surprising. I'm going to give it a few minutes and then force detachment.
To deal with this narrowly, I'm going to:
...
Nov 22 2019
Nov 21 2019
T13463 is approximately the same as this, but now ripe; I'm going to merge this there.