When grepping in a repository, the results should (optionally) be ordered by their blame date.

(Some of this discussion is pertinent to T9287: Working with many repositories)

Please see Contributing Feature Requests for instructions on how to file a constructive feature request.

That's ok, I found some more: https://tenor.com/

Looks like it was deprecated a while ago, without explanation. Luckily, there's --log-junit, which we have some code to parse.

In rPf2fcafb40dde94ddf4ee22716fea74fca0334a64#38198, @chad wrote:

Overall, I prefer reading a diff over a commit message.

From T12771:

Global Rule for Differential Diffs
When:
[ Repository ] [ does not exist ]
Take these actions:
[ Block diff with message ] [ "Repository unrecognized. See https://helpful-docs.com/repository-help for details." ]

Anecdotally, In T9530 we had a concept of "Actions" that users can take on Releases - e.g. "Move to the next phase in the cycle". We broadly wanted to use Harbormaster to allow defining these actions, and one of the issues I had there was that for some actions, the users expected them to happen inline, pretty much like here.

Does it at least tell you how fast you're going?

Ahh, makes sense now :)

Why is this Nuance and not Doorkeeper?

We need to have enough information to actually see the problem happening, so we can figure out what's wrong, and maybe even test a fix.

• Users may not want to fetch --all for some reason.

We need a "Resolved: Ghosts" status.

Which version of git was used? Can you upload the original patch file used to create the diff?
Which version of git is the server using?

It saves it to a directory called arc in your repository meta-directory. If you're using git, it would be in .git/arc/.

You can user arc set-config --local to set a configuration value in a file that is in the repository but is not committed.

arc linters phpcs shows both standard and phpcs.standard configuration options. Have you tried both?

This might be a variant of T2465. There's some workaround described there that might help.

I had a friend once which I think had a fejolollololal farm.

@epriestley: I think this one should actually be in Request Review state?

Which version of phabricator are you running? Email I get have a plain-text alternate, have no meta tag, and are formatted very differently.

I'm pretty sure I've seen this exact request ("Build a templated set of tasks in one go") a little while ago (2 months?), but I can't find it.

Wasn't this supposed to show up as an option in "Edit Profile Picture"?

mm, yeah, I didn't actually read it 😊 @kfsone said in the chat that it can be resolved, but this does actually sound like trust email address should win over require-email-verification.

auth.email-domains implies auth.require-email-verification.

Yeah, the long-term plans are "automatic staging areas", which are essentially some kind of hidden refs (Probably using T8092 though, not just hiding stuff).

Will this also phix my password?

@dreadlord2203: Why don't you use a different repository for the staging area?

Presumably resolved.

Also, really great bug report :)

Do you maybe have SELinux or AppArmor running?

Bug reports need complete reproduction instructions and complete version information. See Contributing Bug Reports, Providing Reproduction Steps, and Providing Version Information.

(There's no need for a token to get the changlog via conduit)

The auth is trying to protect your code from outsiders. You can make the whole repo "public", and then there will be no auth requirement.

I've implemented the sudo approach at some point - P2016 - and I think it worked alright.

mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/var/storage/3f/49’: Permission denied

I wouldn't expect anything in the logs; You can try running a script and running something like this:

$d = new DateTimeZone("Asia/Jerusalem");
var_dump($d->getOffset(new DateTime('@'.time())));

IF you're getting back FALSE, then it's definitely this.

See T10038 - the most likely way to move this forward is by creating an extension from it and adding to Community Resources, and each interested party to install it separately.
Basically no new linters are accepted upstream right now, and even bugfixes are rare.

I would argue that at least for email ("External Targets"), we should always include the timezone when rendering times. When we allowed custom time-format, I've also added it there (Partly because there wasn't the time-zone warning we have now, partly because I kept my phabricator config to PST when traveling, and partly to make copying the time easier).

I don't think there's any way to check for that via Herald. There's the Land Revision button( T182), which I ❤, but it's still a prototype and has some surprising behavior built into it (If you're doing anything complex, it can sometime land stuff you didn't want it to).

It's the ? key on the keyboard. In only works when the focus isn't in any
text-box (If you're using a Mac, that might not be an option for you).

That's the expected behavior - see https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/differential_faq/

Hit ? to see a list of all available keyboard shortcuts.

T10405: Phabricator should generally work properly even if "gd" is not installed

Add the icon+color picker from projects!

I don't see how to configure/use that

Neither can I - I may have imagined it being possible to "lock" the edit form of a task to the one that was used to create them...

Can a task mutate between "feature" and "risk"? If not, can you use a different Custom Form for each type, which will hide the unused fields?

How did you end up in this state?
Is this part of a fresh install, or an upgrade? If upgrade, what version was the old code, and what version is the new code?

Some more shenanigans: