General question: Why is the owners option "Add as reviewer (blocking)" if an owner uploads a revision? I know that this is expected, but why? For example at Wikimedia we currently have the system, that every change needs a review from an "owner" before the patch gets merged, so it's not useful, if an owner of the package uploads a change, and no reviewers get added. Maybe the a compromise may be a setting, where you can choose, if a package gets added as reviewer too, if the author of the revision is an owner too? I think that would help all.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
May 23 2016
May 18 2016
May 17 2016
May 16 2016
May 13 2016
May 12 2016
If you hide urls, nothing changes at the other places:
- for example if I would disable https://secure.phabricator.com/diffusion/P/uri/view/48/
- https://secure.phabricator.com/diffusion/P/manage/uris/ would still show, that this URL is enabled, same at
- https://secure.phabricator.com/diffusion/P/ in that case.
May 11 2016
Merci :)
May 6 2016
Thanks for that quick fix. :)
D15865 fixed some issues, but if you go to manage repo, and click reload there is still a problem: After that action phabricator redirects to the main repo page. Is that expected? The disadvantage is, that this causes long webpage load, if you have a normal repo. Is there a solution for that?
May 5 2016
Ok, thanks.
I filed T10927.
Apr 20 2016
Apr 15 2016
In T9897#161715, @chad wrote:Looks like maybe Macros aren't visible to outside people. Found https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/phame/post/view/1/what_s_new_lots_of_improvements_on_phabricator.wikimedia.org/
Apr 10 2016
Apr 6 2016
Mar 24 2016
Sry, the relevant steps are:
- metamta.mail-adapter is PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerLiteAdapter
and I got the same settings since more than a half year, (I don't know, if additional e-mail configs are required, if so, please ask) but since a short time (I don't know the exact date, but it is less than one week) there were no emails send, and the daemon throws this error (at the task description). I hope this helps.
Mar 23 2016
That's before you're uploading the diff. If you already uploaded the diff, and say: "Oh, I forget to insert a parameter" for example, you can't use that.
Mar 22 2016
Mar 21 2016
Can you fix the issue with arcanist in near time, that arcanist does not accept milestones at differential diffs? This is very annoying.
Mar 17 2016
At the moment this is not implemented yet, so this is a feature request, not a bug report.
Mar 16 2016
Mar 15 2016
In T4887#164619, @Luke081515.2 wrote:Maybe a good idea too:
- What about if you can configure at owners, if the owners should added as (blocking) reviewers automatically? Makes this simple too.
From the homepage:
Mar 13 2016
Mar 12 2016
Maybe a good idea too:
- What about if you can configure at owners, if the owners should added as (blocking) reviewers automatically? Makes this simple too.
Mar 11 2016
Mar 9 2016
Mar 8 2016
That's why I'm requesting that, you can already CC yourself, but not others :-/
Mar 6 2016
Calendar doesn't have the advantage of a countdown, and it is an advantage to create a calendar and a countdown event. I don't think a CC bar makes Countdown really more complex, it would only look a bit more like some other appilcations.
In some cases countdowns are more useful, because
- It is very simple
- You got only the start date, for exmaple for a product release
- You got not a lot of data, e.g. invitees, duration, end date, so you just have to set date and description, and you can use it
That's why in some situation countdown is better. This doesn't means, that I don't use calendar, but for some things countdown is better, because it is simple, and fast.
Mar 5 2016
Feb 26 2016
Feb 24 2016
Feb 20 2016
Yeah.
Feb 19 2016
Thanks for help!
In this case...
What about the following solution:
Display the workboard to the user, if he is able to see it, but don't show the panels which he can't see?
Feb 14 2016
Feb 13 2016
Feb 12 2016
Feb 11 2016
Feb 7 2016
Feb 6 2016
Feb 5 2016
I got the reason for this error now:
I don't know why, but in this case PHD was not the owner, (root was it) of the repo, so you can make him an owner, or change chmod, so that phd is able to write.
Feb 4 2016
Feb 3 2016
Feb 2 2016
Feb 1 2016
If you put your mouse cursor at the picture, is the name shown? Otherwise it may be hard to see which user is it, if more than one user uses the normal picture.
Is it allowed to set up a patch with other motivator facts? For example a motivator like:
Jan 31 2016
Jan 30 2016
Jan 28 2016
Jan 26 2016
Jan 23 2016
Jan 21 2016
Jan 20 2016
Jan 17 2016
Jan 16 2016
This is very nice :), but I got three questions left:
Jan 15 2016
I think this design is really great! Is this full live or just a part?
Jan 13 2016
Thank you very much for that quick fix :)