| tycho.tatitscheff | |
| May 18 2015, 8:05 PM |
| F409148: Screenshot from 2015-05-18 21-56-40.png | |
| May 18 2015, 8:05 PM |
I wish there were some king of method resolution order for displaying the project "tags".
In this example T33 was created first the T34-36 as subtasks of T33.
And as you can see the tags are not consistently ordered
Short term :
Long term :
Well @chad the short term isnt' about a custom field or so.
It is just that I find more consistant to get the tag in a fixed order instead of random one. No user interface change.
We don't generally build features like that, that is as a one-off request. We look at a collection of feature requests and plan a path forward that solves many problems with a scalable system. That is T418.
Also, check out https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabcontrib/article/feature_requests/. We prefer feature requests just state problems and not solutions, mostly that there may already be a solution to your problem or the solution we want in the upstream may differ from your suggestion.
All my fault. I m gonna read this and impove my future requests (More Arez Comming ! Fear).
I was just surprised that this task was merge into "Integrate custom field for XXXX".
But now, It's all clear !